Death intensifies self-doubt as Shakespeare deepens the ethics of forgetting, portraying a speaker who fears that remembrance would harm the beloved by exposing unworthiness, and who transforms love into an act of radical self-erasure.
Sonnet 72 – Read and Listen
O! lest the world should task you to recite
What merit lived in me, that you should love
After my death, dear love, forget me quite,
For you in me can nothing worthy prove;
Unless you would devise some virtuous lie,
To do more for me than mine own desert,
And hang more praise upon deceased I
Than niggard truth would willingly impart:
O! lest your true love may seem false in this,
That you for love speak well of me untrue,
My name be buried where my body is,
And live no more to shame nor me nor you.
For I am shamed by that which I bring forth,
And so should you, to love things nothing worth.
»»» Introduction to Shakespeare’s Sonnets
»»» Complete Sonnets List
»»» Sonnets in Italian
Introduction to Sonnet 72
Sonnet 72 continues directly from the farewell logic of Sonnet 71, but it darkens and complicates it. If the previous poem asked the beloved not to mourn, this sonnet explains why remembrance itself would be unjust. Shakespeare moves beyond the desire to protect the beloved from pain and confronts a more troubling conviction: that the speaker’s own worth may not justify memory at all.
The poem is shaped by profound self-suspicion. The speaker does not merely fear grief; he fears judgment. To be remembered is to be evaluated, discussed, and compared, and Shakespeare imagines that such scrutiny would expose inadequacy rather than honor.
Sonnet 72 therefore reframes love as ethical concealment. Forgetting becomes an act of mercy, shielding the beloved not only from sorrow, but from association with something deemed unworthy.
Analysis — Sonnet 72
First Quatrain — Memory as Burden
The opening quatrain revisits the request for forgetting, but now with sharper justification. Remembrance is presented as a weight rather than a gift.
Shakespeare suggests that memory invites comparison. To remember is to place the dead alongside the living.
The speaker anticipates that such comparison would diminish rather than elevate.
Love, therefore, must release rather than preserve.
Second Quatrain — Fear of Judgment
In the second quatrain, the poem introduces judgment explicitly. The speaker fears being spoken of after death.
Language itself becomes dangerous. Praise risks exaggeration; honesty risks exposure.
Shakespeare presents reputation as unstable even beyond the grave.
To be remembered is to lose control of one’s image.
Third Quatrain — Love Entangled With Shame
The third quatrain deepens the emotional cost. The speaker imagines that remembrance would reflect poorly on the beloved.
Association becomes contamination. Loving memory would bind the beloved to something flawed.
Shakespeare transforms love into an act of withdrawal.
Self-erasure becomes protection.
Final Couplet — Forgetting as Justice
The final couplet resolves the argument with severity. Forgetting is not cruelty, but fairness.
To erase the speaker is to preserve the beloved’s dignity.
Conclusion
Sonnet 72 represents one of the sequence’s most severe acts of self-negation. Shakespeare dismantles the desire for remembrance by presenting memory as a moral risk rather than a consolation.
The poem suggests that love can require disappearance. To care fully for the beloved may mean removing oneself from their future entirely.
By turning forgetting into an ethical necessity, Sonnet 72 pushes devotion to an extreme conclusion. Love is no longer measured by endurance in memory, but by the willingness to vanish when presence would burden, compromise, or diminish the one who remains.
Sonetto 72 – In Italiano ·
◀ Sonnet 71 · Sonnet 73 ▶
Sonnet by William Shakespeare.
Text and audio are in the public domain.
LibriVox recording.
All LibriVox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information, or to volunteer, please visit
LibriVox.org.
Read by Elizabeth Klett.
