Shakespeare tells the beloved not to seek remembrance in written notes or gift-tables, because the beloved already lives permanently within his memory. External records can be lost, forgotten, or stolen, but inner love cannot. The sonnet therefore rejects material tokens in favour of a deeper archive: the heart itself, where true devotion is kept beyond time’s decay.
Sonnet 122 – Read and Listen
Thy gift, thy tables, are within my brain
Full character’d with lasting memory,
Which shall above that idle rank remain,
Beyond all date; even to eternity:
Or, at the least, so long as brain and heart
Have faculty by nature to subsist;
Till each to razed oblivion yield his part
Of thee, thy record never can be miss’d.
That poor retention could not so much hold,
Nor need I tallies thy dear love to score;
Therefore to give them from me was I bold,
To trust those tables that receive thee more:
To keep an adjunct to remember thee
Were to import forgetfulness in me.
»»» Introduction to Shakespeare’s Sonnets
»»» Complete Sonnets List
»»» Sonnets in Italian
Introduction to Sonnet 122
Sonnet 122 is Shakespeare’s meditation on memory and the problem of external reminders. At first, the speaker addresses the beloved’s “gift” and “tables,” which likely refer to writing tablets or a notebook used to record names, debts, and dates. However, Shakespeare insists that such objects are unnecessary, because the beloved is already permanently inscribed in his mind.
Moreover, the poem presents memory as something stronger than any material record. The beloved’s image is “full character’d” within the brain, written in lasting letters. Consequently, this inner record remains “beyond all date,” reaching toward eternity.
The sonnet also acknowledges a limit: brain and heart will only last so long as nature allows. Nevertheless, until oblivion finally erases all human faculty, the beloved’s record cannot truly be missed, because love has stored it in the deepest place.
In addition, Shakespeare contrasts true remembrance with “poor retention.” A fragile memory might need tallies and scores. The speaker, however, refuses such accounting, because love should not be treated like debt. Therefore, he dares to give away the physical tables and trust the greater tables: mind and heart.
The final couplet delivers the poem’s moral. To keep an external adjunct is to invite forgetfulness. In short, written reminders are not proof of devotion; they may even be the sign that devotion is uncertain. Love that is real requires no props, because it already contains what it loves.
Analysis — Sonnet 122
First Quatrain — The Beloved Written in the Brain
The first quatrain turns the beloved’s gift into an internal document. For example, “tables” are now “within my brain,” fully written with lasting memory.
Shakespeare claims this record will remain above the “idle rank” of outward things. Therefore, his love is not dependent on objects that can be lost or damaged. The phrase “beyond all date” elevates remembrance into permanence.
Second Quatrain — Memory Versus Oblivion
In the second quatrain Shakespeare adds a condition. The record lasts as long as brain and heart still have faculty to exist. However, the poet accepts that eventually both will yield to “razed oblivion.”
Yet the argument remains strong. Until that final erasure, the record of the beloved cannot be missed. Consequently, there is no need for external proof: love has already engraved what matters most.
Third Quatrain — Rejecting Tallies and Scores
The third quatrain rejects the logic of bookkeeping. “Poor retention” cannot hold much, and people may need tallies to “score” affection. In contrast, Shakespeare’s love is not a quantity that must be counted.
He explains why he gave away the tables: he trusts the inward tables that receive the beloved more completely. Moreover, this is an ethical claim: love belongs in the heart, not in ledgers.
Final Couplet — External Adjunct as Forgetfulness
The couplet is sharp and paradoxical. To keep an adjunct to remember the beloved would “import forgetfulness.” In other words, reliance on objects implies inner absence.
The conclusion therefore elevates devotion into self-sufficiency. True love remembers without tools. Ultimately, the mind itself becomes the monument.
Conclusion
Sonnet 122 argues that the strongest remembrance is internal. At first, the poem seems to address a small token—tables or a gift. However, Shakespeare transforms that token into a larger philosophy of love.
Moreover, the beloved is already fully written within the mind, beyond all date. Consequently, external notes become unnecessary. The poem even warns that such aids may invite forgetfulness. In short, love does not need props: it becomes its own archive.
Ultimately, Sonnet 122 replaces material records with a deeper permanence. The beloved is not kept on a page but within the heart, where devotion survives longer than any written table can endure.
Sonetto 122 – In Italiano ·
◀ Sonnet 121 · Sonnet 123 ▶
Sonnet by William Shakespeare.
Text and audio are in the public domain.
LibriVox recording.
All LibriVox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information, or to volunteer, please visit
LibriVox.org.
Read by Elizabeth Klett.
